Quantcast
Subscribe now
Get The Machine sampler (first 4 chapters) free the instant you subscribe! You'll also receive each of my posts, fresh in your inbox. 
(You'll get The Machine sampler in your inbox the instant you subscribe!)
THE SMALL PRINT: We know you're taking a risk when you entrust us with your email address, so we commit: (a) to NEVER spam you; (b) to NEVER sell or rent your data to anyone; (c) to ALWAYS make it easy for you to unsubscribe; (d) to ONLY send you stuff you reasonably expect to receive; (e) to contact you LESS frequently than you would reasonably expect.

The term sales process is used freely within most organizations.

The reality, however, is that most sales functions do not resemble processes.  If you reflect on a typical process elsewhere in the organization, you’ll recognize that the most fundamental pre-requisites for process are absent from the sales environment:

  1. A standard workflow
  2. Division of labor (specialization)
  3. Centralized workflow management
In most sales environments there is no process (in a formal sense of the word).  Most are structured as industry used to be prior to the dawn of the industrial revolution.
In  place of process we have artisans: individuals who have assumed absolute responsibility for the entire end-to-end sales function.  (Actually, in most organization, these individuals own the entire client-interface.)
There are numerous negative effects associated with the artisan (or autonomous-agent) model:
  1. Salespeople are distracted from selling by the numerous competing demands on their time
  2. Salespeople tend to oscillate between business-development and fulfillment related activities — resulting in a highly-variable (and unpredictable) flow of sales
  3. Shared responsibilities (an oxymoron) result in conflict between sales and other functions (particularly fulfillment)
  4. Salespeople are all but impossible to manage (sales managers lack both accurate information and control)
Sales Process Engineering addresses the root cause of these negative effects by challenging the autonomous-agent model.  SPE transitions salespeople from autonomous agents to (true) team members.
The essence of SPE is division-of-labor.  And, division-of-labor is impossible without a standardized workflow and centralized workflow management.  Of course, these are the three pre-requisites for formal process we identified earlier.  In theory, then, SPE results in the sales function transitioning from its current pre-industrial form to a process (in the formal sense of the word).
In practice, the implications of SPE are significant:
  1. Salespeople focus exclusively on selling (typically performing four business-development appointments a day, five days a week)
  2. Salespeople are supported by a team of specialists who take responsibility for promotion, clerical tasks and technical activities
  3. The management of sales opportunities (and salespeople’s calendars) is centralized and management is provided with both current and accurate data and with the control required to execute their decisions
While SPE may appear radical, in reality, it isn’t.
SPE involves nothing more than leading the sales function down the same path that manufacturing has trodden over the last 150 years.
In the last 150 years this journey has provided manufacturing with staggering improvements in both productivity and quality.  SPE offers sales benefits of a similar magnitude.  However, because this is a path that manufacturing has already trodden, sales can make the transition in months, not years.
Typically, SPE results in the following:
  1. A significant reduction in the size of the sales team
  2. The conversion of most existing (technical) salespeople into project leaders (responsible for managing the interface between sales and fulfillment)
  3. A ten-times increase in the number of business-development appointments performed by the remaining salespeople
  4. An improvement in customer service
  5. A reduction in sales cycle-time
  6. Minimal capital expenditure
  7. Minimal increase in operating expenses

To learn more about SPE, please take a look at the following:

  1. One-page SPE Primer
  2. Whitepaper: How to build a high-throughput sales process

Home Forums SPE: Sales Process Engineering

This topic contains 4 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by  Justin Roff-Marsh 3 years, 1 month ago.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #25610 Reply

    Scott

    How much do schedulers get paid?

    #25611 Reply

    In cities where salespeople earn $120k to $180k, I’d expect sales coordinators to earn $55k to 60k.

    Justin

    #25613 Reply

    Scott

    It seems to me that the scheduler has a lot of responsibility in getting 5 appointments per day for each sales person. I’ve been in all kinds of sales and have made calls to companies where you have to get past gate keepers and making 50-100 appointments a week is not realistic. Thoughts?

    #25614 Reply

    Three things.

    There’s a one to one ratio of salespeople to sales coordinators.

    4 is the average, not 5, nowadays.

    It’s the job of marketing to generate opps. The SC just scheduled them.

    Justin

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Reply To: SPE: Sales Process Engineering
Your information: