If you tell your team to ‘maximize sales’ that may be a tacit admission of a flaw in the design of your business!

Your Director of Sales should be charged with the responsibility for maximizing sales, right?

Well, maybe not!

If he or she is, it might be worth reflecting on what this says about how your critical business functions are resourced.

Let’s assume (for simplicity) that your business consists of just two basic functions:

  1. Sales
  2. Production

Ask yourself, which of these functions should be the system constraint?  If we recognize that a balanced system is a practical impossibility, we have two choices:

  1. Maintain protective capacity in sales – so as to ensure that production is always fully loaded with work (and, consequently, operates at 100% utilization)
  2. Maintain protective capacity in production – so as to ensure that whatever is sold can be rapidly delivered

Now, option (2) may sound appealing but, in most businesses this is not the optimal resourcing model.  To understand why, let’s start with the goal of the business:

The goal of the business is to make money (now, and in the future).

In practice, ‘make money’ means maximize the return on owners’ equity.  In most businesses, the greater majority of owners’ equity is invested in production (plant).

Therefore, in most businesses, profitability is maximized when production is consistently maintained at 100% utilization.

So this analysis points to option (1) as the optimal one.  This means that, if management wishes to maximize the profitability of the business it will deliberately design the sales function so that it has greater capacity then sales.  It will then resource and manage the sales function to ensure that this protective capacity is maintained at all times.

If management is doing exactly this is, it really likely that the Director of Sales will be issued a general instruction to ‘maximize sales’?

It’s not, is it?  If production has less capacity than sales, operating the sales function at full capacity will eventually cause on-time-delivery performance to drop to the point where clients elect to take their business elsewhere.

If production has less capacity than sales, management is more likely to advise the sales function to subordinate effectively to production.  In plain-English, this means that the job of sales should be to maintain the queue of forward-orders at its optimal size.

So, remember, if you catch yourself regularly advising your sales team to maximize sales, you are making a tacit admission that you have boundless capacity in production.  Is this really optimal?

If not, you have three choices:

  1. Reduce production capacity, until you consistently have protective capacity in sales (and, possibly enjoy an immediate reduction in operating expenses)
  2. Increase the capacity of your sales (which means, either adding salespeople or talking to us about improving the efficiency of this function)
  3. Do both!
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

One Response to “If you tell your team to ‘maximize sales’ that may be a tacit admission of a flaw in the design of your business!”

  1. SKI Says:

    Great mental exercise for a Sunday morning.

    May I suggest that you forgot two other likely choices?

    4. Status Quo

    I always list it first. It provides an easy way to bail out of a project when you find out the leadership is paying lip service to change. Nothing will take years off one’s life faster than dealing with bozos on a daily basis. Life is too short. Of course when you noticed the (perfectly healthy) CEO’s Porsche consistently parked in the handicap spot in front of the building, you should have found a quicker way to bail… but I digress.

    5. Biz Basics Boot Camp

    People rarely know what they do not know. Justin’s work on SPE is just so much common sense. So much so, that the first time I read one of his White Papers on it, I thought he was all wrong.

    But over coffee one morning, just thinking about the ramifications of Ballistix SPE, I had to admit that he was absolutely 100% spot on. When you take the time to think it through (something most Americans just hate to do!), there is but one conclusion: SPE has to work.

    But in my experience, just like fitting a rocket engine to your Piper Cub, bolting on SPE to most organizations is not going to work. At least not for long. Until the underlying assumptions are challenged (and exposed), any gains will be short lived. At best. Most often, they are simply rejected outright.

    That “If there were a better way, we would have thought it” ego-speak of the doomed. Enter the requirement to ’school’ leadership as well as the rank & file on business basics. Think military: they train and train, then train some more. All just to be effective.

    Ask yourself: when was the last time you attended any training?

    Thanks again Justin for a great article on addressing the weakest link.

    -ski

Leave a Reply